Today we assigned our students some more task work. We do this often, if not daily.
Todays little gift...... Each student will need to do 12 different wheels of drum brake assembly. Tear down each set of brakes, show us the bare brake shoes, then reassemble the brakes correctly. If it's not right, tear it down and do over.
45 students at the moment.
Do the math on that..... My partner and I will have to check 540 sets of brakes off the vehicle (easy), then 540 assembled drum brake setups (takes some time). That's 1080 individual inspections, if not one student made one single mistake. The reality.... we will have more like 2000 inspection operations to perform, with just this one task. While we do an elaborate theory lesson on the operations, with large screen live video of the hands on portion, we can till expect to re-teach it to at least half the class in the next few days.
In addition (Yes, we are cruel!) we issued a task requiring each student to do one wheel of drum brakes.... remove drum, tear down brakes, assemble brakes, and drum back on..... in 4 minutes or under. We time them. Thats another 45 tasks that will require one of us to stand there with a stopwatch while the other instructor manages the other 44 students in the shop.
The point of the first task..... is they learn how to properly put together a number of different drum brake systems and gain hands on experience. The point of the second task...... it can't be done without practice..... and gained skill.
I usually lose a few pounds during this section of the class....... :-)
Oh..... and something else for the mathematically challenged tie wearing class.
Today my partner had an 'observation'. That's where an administrator with less classroom experience than the instructor observes the teacher in action officially, then offers critical thoughts on teaching skill to the best of their official abilities.
It's state mandated, which is only reason it happens, I think.
The admins thoughts today....
My partner needs to split questions more equally between males and females in the class. Each gender should get the same amount of questions.
We are an Automotive Mechanics program. We have one female and forty four males. (She is an adult student paying hard cash to be there, and one of my best students).
Now... that means if we ask questions during theory, as we are supposed to, and try to involve each student, as we are supposed to, then we will ask each male *1* question and our one female *44* questions.
To an administrator.... this makes sense.
I regard it as another bit of proof that Darwin might have been wrong.
5 comments:
Seniority at airlines is usually driven by union rules, based on hire date and then date of birth, but in the old days at one carrier, it was based on hire date AND class scores. Seniority is crucial because it makes a BIG difference in when you upgrade to Captain and the pay difference between Captain and copilot is so large, even a few months can make or break a person's budget.
Initial ground school was six weeks, mostly systems on the plane you'd be assigned to. Classes were large. In my class there were only two women. We studied every night. . .and long hours. The guys studied a bit. . but most nights we'd see them in the hotel bar as we toted books back to our room with take out sandwiches. On the hotel's "naughty nightie night" in the lounge, modeling time, they'd be there ALL evening. We never took even a weekend day off, writing notes, pasting a big poster of the cockpit up on the wall in the room we shared, with chairs set up like crewmembers and running through the flows and memory system items. I graduated first in the class. . she second, but the guys said it was rigged so we'd have easier questions. Uh. . no. . we just worked at it.
My one girl earns her grade. She studies hard, and works hard. It shows in her grade. Try 105% on theory... yes, she nailed even the extra credit.
Thing is... I doubt she'll be a tech in life.... but she's gaining skills in any case.
I am so darn envious of your students. I was barred from shop courses in school so pretty much had to learn by thinking prior and during assembly of most anything. I know, shame on me, I consulted shop manuals 'when all else failed'. It would have been such a help to have been through classes on theory and given experience with multiple iterations on a given mechanical system.
But I would NOT have envied the sole female student getting 44 more times the attention and scrutiny. What's wrong with treating her like the rest of the kids since that's what she'd find out there in the real world of employment?
She does NOT get 44 times the scrutiny. What the desk jockeys want is not necessarily what happens.
She is my student, not theirs. She gets treated just like everyone else.
Well, not everyone. I did arrange her own locker space in a room that the door actually closes on, unlike my young gentleman who I DON'T TRUST BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!
Lin.... not only do my students have to consult shop manuals and data systems, they do it so often
they get start to do it as second nature.
All part of my evil plan!
Oh sigh, sigh, sigh ... where were teachers like you 30 years ago? Sure would have made my life so much easier, well, at least I might not have starved so often.
I do wonders with a well illustrated and exploded view parts book but manuals still send chills down my spine ... wonderfully evil planning on your part - don't ever stop.
Post a Comment